HUBUNGAN INTENSITAS PENGGUNAAN GENERATIVE AI DENGAN REGULASI DIRI DALAM BELAJAR PEMROGRAMAN PADA MAHASISWA TEKNIK INFORMATIKA: STUDI KUANTITATIF KORELASIONAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62671/suliwa.v3i3.357Keywords:
Generative AI, Regulasi dalam belajar, Programming education, Usage intensity, Correlational studyAbstract
Generative AI (GenAI) is increasingly used by students to learn programming, yet it remains unclear how the intensity of its use relates to self-regulated learning (SRL). This study examined the relationship between GenAI usage intensity and SRL in programming among informatics engineering students. A cross-sectional correlational survey was conducted using convenience sampling (n = 86). Usage intensity was measured by frequency and duration of use over the previous 30 days and expressed as estimated hours per week. SRL was measured with a 16-item adapted version of the Self-Regulation of Learning Instrument for Undergraduates, grounded in Zimmerman's cyclical model. Data were analyzed using Spearman's correlation. Usage intensity showed a weak positive correlation with SRL (ρ = 0.272, p = 0.011). However, the association was not robust: it was not significant after excluding 22 respondents with identical answers to all items (ρ = 0.116, p = 0.363) or after controlling for semester and course status (partial ρ = 0.191, p = 0.081). In exploratory analyses, duration of use, but not frequency, remained associated with SRL. The findings are correlational and should be interpreted cautiously.
References
An, Q., Hwee, J., Koh, L., & Liu, Q. (2026). Generative artificial intelligence in higher education: A systematic review of student use and learning outcomes. In Australasian Journal of Educational Technology (Vol. 2026, Number 3). https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1412-0615
Atif, A., & Dickson-Deane, C. (2026). Scaffold or shortcut? Learning Letters, 8, 63. https://doi.org/10.20851/ll.v8.63
Cheng, G. (2021). The Effects of Self-regulated Learning Strategies on Computer Programming Achievement in Teacher Education. Frontiers in Education Technology, 4(4), p37. https://doi.org/10.22158/fet.v4n4p37
Cong-Lem, N., & Fan, H. (2026). Exploring the effects of generative AI (GenAI) on learning outcomes: A scoping review. In Fan Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning (Vol. 22).
Fan, Y., Tang, L., Le, H., Shen, K., Tan, S., Zhao, Y., Shen, Y., Li, X., & Gašević, D. (2025). Beware of metacognitive laziness: Effects of generative artificial intelligence on learning motivation, processes, and performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(2), 489–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13544
Foschi, L. C., & Petrucco, C. (2026). Delegators or Self-regulators? Exploring University Students’ Self-Regulated Learning with AI 1.
Groothuijsen, S., van den Beemt, A., Remmers, J. C., & van Meeuwen, L. W. (2024). AI chatbots in programming education: Students’ use in a scientific computing course and consequences for learning. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100290
Lan, M., & Zhou, X. (2025). A qualitative systematic review on AI empowered self-regulated learning in higher education. Npj Science of Learning, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00319-0
Lin, B. (2025). The influence of the usage intensity of generative AI tools by college students on their autonomous learning ability. SHS Web of Conferences, 222, 01003. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202522201003
López-Angulo, Y., Sáez-Delgado, F., Gaeta, M. L., Mella-Norambuena, J., González-Robaina, Y., & Muñoz-Inostroza, K. (2024). Validation of the self-regulation of learning instrument for undergraduates. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1464424
Ng, D. T. K., Tan, C. W., & Leung, J. K. L. (2024). Empowering student self-regulated learning and science education through ChatGPT: A pioneering pilot study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(4), 1328–1353. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13454
Öztürk, M. (2022). The effect of self-regulated programming learning on undergraduate students’ academic performance and motivation. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 19(3), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-04-2021-0074
Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. In Frontiers in Psychology (Vol. 8, Number APR). Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
Rahe, C., & Maalej, W. (2025). How Do Programming Students Use Generative AI? Proceedings of the ACM on Software Engineering, 2(FSE), 978–1000. https://doi.org/10.1145/3715762
Sun, D., Boudouaia, A., Zhu, C., & Li, Y. (2024). Would ChatGPT-facilitated programming mode impact college students’ programming behaviors, performances, and perceptions? An empirical study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00446-5
UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research.
Xia, Q., Liu, Q., Tlili, A., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2026). A systematic literature review on designing self-regulated learning using generative artificial intelligence and its future research directions. Computers & Education, 240, 105465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105465
Xu, J., Luo, Y., Wang, C., Wang, M., & Wu, Y. (2026). British Journal of Educational Technology REVIEW ARTICLE AI support in self-regulated learning: A decade of technological evolution and meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 57(5), 1191–1220. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.70058
Xue, Y., Chen, H., Bai, G. R., Tairas, R., & Huang, Y. (2024). Does ChatGPT Help With Introductory Programming? An Experiment of Students Using ChatGPT in CS1. Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering, 331–341. https://doi.org/10.1145/3639474.3640076
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Diva Nadya Putri, Taufiq, Yunita (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
