SISTEM PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN PENILAIAN WAITERS TERBAIK PADA MENSA VOLKSCAFE MENGGUNAKAN PERBANDINGAN METODE TOPSIS DAN ANP-TOPSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62671/suliwa.v2i3.110Keywords:
Decision Support System, TOPSIS, ANP, Best Waiters, Multi-Criteria Decision MakingAbstract
This research develops a decision support system to evaluate the best waiters at Mensa Volkscafe by comparing the TOPSIS and ANP-TOPSIS methods. The TOPSIS method offers advantages in calculation simplicity and its ability to consider various criteria, both subjective and objective, with ease of incorporating important weights. Meanwhile, ANP is a multi-criteria decision analysis method developed from AHP, where each factor and sub-factor are compared, although the calculations become complex with numerous influential factors or sub-factors. The implemented web-based system automates the evaluation process, allowing users to interactively input criteria, alternative, and evaluation values. Five evaluation criteria used are responsibility (K1), punctuality (K2), teamwork (K3), high initiative (K4), and speed in work (K5), with different weights applied for each method. Data was collected through questionnaires from nine waiters at Mensa Volkscafe. The comparison results show differences in the final rankings of the best waiters between the two methods, with Rozatul Jannah ranked first using TOPSIS , and Laurent Simamora ranked first using ANP-TOPSIS. The system's advantages lie in the transparency of the calculation process and the ability to compare the results of both methods, enhancing confidence in the evaluation.
References
Cahyani, D. C., & Arvianto, A. (2024). EVALUASI PEMILIHAN VENDOR BERDASARKAN PENETAPAN KRITERIA EVALUASI REKANAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE ANALYTICAL NETWORK PROCESS (ANP) PADA PENGADAAN KOMPONEN BATTERY N-70 (STUDI KASUS: PT PINDAD PERSERO). Industrial Engineering Online Journal, 13(1). Retrieved from https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/ieoj/article/view/42490
Effendi, U., Wardahniati, A., & Deoranto, P. (2018). Perencanaan Strategi Pemasaran Keripik Kentang dengan Metode ANP dan TOPSIS di Agronas Gizi Food, Kota Batu. Industria: Jurnal Teknologi dan Manajemen Agroindustri, 7(2), 124-132. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.industria.2018.007.02.7
Gustriansyah, R. (2016). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Dosen Berprestasi dengan Metode ANP dan TOPSIS. UAJY, 1, 33–40.
Hendratno, H., & Susanto, E. R. (2024). PRIORITAS REKONSTRUKSI JALAN PROVINSI LAMPUNG BIAYA APBD MENGGUNAKAN METODE ANP. JIPI (Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Informatika), 9(3), 1351-1360.
Latipah, D., & Afriza, A. (2025). Penentuan Siswa Berprestasi Menggunakan Metode Analytic Network Process Dan Topsis Studi Kasus SMK PGRI 1 Balaraja. JINTIKOM : Jurnal Informasi Teknologi Dan Komputer , 1(1), 11–18. Retrieved from https://journal.umbogorraya.ac.id/index.php/jintikom/article/view/344
Mutmainah, I., & Yunita, Y. (2021). Penerapan Metode Topsis Dalam Pemilihan Jasa Ekspedisi. Jurnal Sisfokom (Sistem Informasi Dan Komputer), 10(1), 86-92.
Setiawansyah, S. (2022). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Rekomendasi Tempat Wisata Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS. Jurnal Ilmiah Informatika Dan Ilmu Komputer (JIMA-ILKOM), 1(2), 54-62. https://doi.org/10.58602/jima-ilkom.v1i2.8
Sirojuddin, A., Amirullah, K., Rofiq, M. H., & Kartiko, A. (2022). Peran Sistem Informasi Manajemen dalam Pengambilan Keputusan di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Darussalam Pacet Mojokerto. ZAHRA: Research and Tought Elementary School of Islam Journal, 3(1), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.37812/zahra.v3i1.395
Sulistyorini, R., & Herianto, D. (2010). Analisis Multi Kriteria Sebagai Metode Pemilihan Suatu Alternatif Ruas Jalan di Provinsi Lampung. Rekayasa, Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Perencanaan, 14(3), 147-156.
Wibowo, D. O., & Priandika, A. T. (2021). Sistem pendukung keputusan pemilihan gedung pernikahan pada wilayah bandar lampung menggunakan metode topsis. J. Inform. dan Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak, 2(1), 73-85.
